Law, Rights, and Justice essay They tried to draw a sharp line between acceptable forms of “civil disobedience” and the unwarranted ones. One of the key characteristics of the justified “civil disobedience”, according to both of them is its non-violent nature and its manifestations within the limits of law of the country. Both of the theorists consider “civil disobedience” to be primarily a political act with the purpose of changing some law or its consequences. According to Rawls it is not viewed from the point of the acts of “civil disobedience” being or not being truly democratic, but for the point of the value of the moral principles defended by these acts.

Critical Theory Discussion Essay As the problem of “civil disobedience” is a matter of a mismatch of interests in a society and for this reason it is also an aspect to be subjected to the criticism of this theory.”Civil disobedience” is always caused by the violation of moral principles by the government and defends these principles by the acts of disobedience. The acts of “civil disobedience” can be prevented through making the laws support not only the interests of the “majority”(the ruling class is usually called “majority”), but also take into account the importance of other interests too.

Law, Rights, and Justice essay The main principles of law, rights and justice and the relation of “civil disobedience” to them.

Critical Theory Discussion Essay The develpment of the critical theory as related to the meaning of justice within the society.

Law, Rights, and Justice essay Why did Ronald Dworkin and John Rawls dedicate their work to the analysis of the principle of law, rights and justice? What is the generally accepted definition of “civil disobedience”? When does the breach of the principle of equal liberty and the principle of justice occur?

Critical Theory Discussion Essay Why is critical theory considered to be a very special knowledge? What is the difference between the law and the justice for the society? How does the “civil disobedience” influence the law?

Law, Rights, and Justice essay Civil disobedience cannot “…act breach the same law that is being protested…” -confirms Rawls and it is lead by ”the principles of justice”.

Critical Theory Discussion Essay As the relationships in the society are very dynamic and people learn how to defend their rights and interests, critical theory suggests a speculation from evidence that the law has grown old and does not completely keep the society interests to the level it should.